Date of Award
1-1-2010
Language
English
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
College/School/Department
Department of Philosophy
Content Description
1 online resource (ii, 140 pages) : PDF file
Dissertation/Thesis Chair
Rachel Cohon
Committee Members
Robert Howell, Jon Mandle
Keywords
decision-making method, incommensurability, incomparability, Millgram, practical reason, Ruth Chang, Decision making, Rational choice theory, Comparison (Philosophy)
Subject Categories
Cognitive Psychology | Philosophy
Abstract
When confronted with an important choice between two very different options, an agent often will be at a loss as to how to decide between them. This is often true even if the agent has a good understanding of the pros and cons of each option, and even if she is committed to something like "the best overall decision for me." One way to analyze this situation is to assert that the options are incomparable for the agent. Incomparability arises when, for two options, it seems that one is neither better nor worse than, nor equal to, the other. If cases of incomparability exist, they raise a serious issue for rational decision making. How can an agent make rational decisions if the options she is choosing between are incomparable? My dissertation sets out to define this problem clearly and to provide an original solution to it that allows for the possibility of rational choice in the face of incomparable options.
Recommended Citation
Pinkowski, David, "Resolving incomparability" (2010). Legacy Theses & Dissertations (2009 - 2024). 237.
https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/legacy-etd/237