Date of Award
1-1-2019
Language
English
Document Type
Master's Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
College/School/Department
Department of Psychology
Program
Cognitive Psychology
Content Description
1 online resource (ii, 25 pages)
Dissertation/Thesis Chair
James H. Neely
Committee Members
W. Trammell Neill
Keywords
generalized vs. pair-specific testing effects, retrieval practice, test-potentiated learning, Paired-association learning, Association tests, Learning, Psychology of, Memory, Recollection (Psychology)
Subject Categories
Cognitive Psychology | Psychology
Abstract
The current experiments used short (< 1 min) and long (24-hour) retention intervals in the Test-Potentiated Learning (TPL) paradigm to investigate pair specific versus generalized testing effects (TEs) using weakly related English word pairs. The design of the present experiments improved the design used by Cho, Neely, Crocco, and Vitrano (2017), who used Swahili-English pairs. The present design allows for (a) an assessment of both between- and within-subjects pair-specific vs. generalized TEs within the same experiment and (b) better controlled comparisons of the pair-specific and generalized TEs. There was no TE at the short retention interval. At the long retention interval, the TE for tested pairs studied before and after the review test was greater than the generalized TEs obtained for (a) untested pairs studied before and after the review test and (b) untested pairs that were only studied after the review test. Thus, a pair-specific TE occurred, unlike in Cho et al. (2017). The potential reasons for why weakly related English word pairs show pair-specific TEs but Swahili-English pairs do not are discussed.
Recommended Citation
Bolte, Carol, "When is test-potentiated learning item-specific versus generalized?" (2019). Legacy Theses & Dissertations (2009 - 2024). 2224.
https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/legacy-etd/2224