"The First Amendment on Trial: Hate Speech, Free Speech and College Cam" by Maya Rotman

Date of Award

5-2025

Document Type

Honors Thesis

Degree Name

Bachelor of Arts

Department

English

Advisor/Committee Chair

James D. Lilley

Abstract

This thesis examines the tension between the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech and the harmful impact of hate speech on college campuses. As incidents of targeted, discriminatory rhetoric rise in academic settings, the need to reevaluate what constitutes protected speech has become increasingly urgent. Through legal analysis, including case law such as Brandenburg v. Ohio and Schenck v. United States, this paper argues that the Supreme Court must distinguish between constitutionally protected speech and harmful hate speech. The thesis uses contemporary case studies from college campuses across the country. It includes firsthand accounts from the University at Albany to demonstrate how hate speech, particularly racially and religiously motivated rhetoric, has compromised students’ emotional, psychological, and physical safety. It critiques the inaction of the Supreme Court and compares American policy to Canada’s precedent in R. v. Keegstra, suggesting that legal definitions and limitations on hate speech are both necessary and possible. The paper concludes by calling for the Supreme Court to modernize its interpretation of the First Amendment to ensure that free speech no longer enables discrimination and harassment in academic spaces.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Share

COinS