Date of Award

Fall 2024

Language

English

Embargo Period

10-11-2026

Document Type

Master's Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Arts (MA)

College/School/Department

Department of Psychology

Program

Clinical Psychology

First Advisor

John Forsyth

Committee Members

Mitch Earleywine

Keywords

Acceptance, Psychological Inflexibility, Psychological Flexibility, Meditation, Mindfulness, Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction

Subject Categories

Psychological Phenomena and Processes

Abstract

Objectives: The widespread availability of mindfulness-based practices has led to growing concern about the potential for misuse, namely the use of such practices as a control-based strategy rather than in an acceptance-based manner consistent with research. Thus, the present study aimed to elucidate factors (e.g., mode of instruction, meditation experience, psychological [in]flexibility [PF/PI]) that may relate to intentions guiding meditation use. Methods: Self-taught (ST) and Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) meditators (N = 122, Mage = 46.54, SDage = 16.49, 65.6% Female) completed a battery of measures assessing meditation intentions (control- or acceptance-based), meditation experience (in months), PF/PI, psychological distress, and satisfaction with life. Results: Control-based intentions covaried with worse psychological outcomes while acceptance-based intentions covaried with better outcomes. Meditation intentions and outcomes did not discriminate between ST and MBSR groups. Yet, satisfaction with life was significantly greater in the MBSR group relative to the ST group. PF fully mediated relations between meditation experience and acceptance-based intentions, whereas PI fully mediated relations between meditation experience and control-based intentions. Conclusion: Meditation experience, rather than mode of instruction, appears to influence whether meditation is used in an acceptance- or control-based context. Mediational findings suggest that such relations work through PF/PI processes. Longitudinal research is needed to evaluate whether meditation intentions change over time and the extent to which such changes influence the acceptability and utility of meditation itself.

License

This work is licensed under the University at Albany Standard Author Agreement.

Available for download on Sunday, October 11, 2026

Share

COinS