ORCID

0009-0001-1207-9989

Date of Award

Summer 2026

Language

English

Embargo Period

7-6-2026

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

College/School/Department

Department of Public Administration and Policy

Program

Public Administration and Policy

First Advisor

Jennifer Dodge

Committee Members

Luis F. Luna-Reyes, Jeongyoon Lee, Mikhail Ivonchyk

Keywords

Discourse network, hydraulic fracturing, environmental policy, policy process, discourse coalition

Subject Categories

Environmental Policy | Public Administration | Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration | Public Policy

Abstract

Beneath the policy debates of many environmental controversies lies a dynamic network of actors making claims, forming coalitions, and contesting policy discourses. Drawing on theories of discourse coalitions, discourse networks, network brokerage, and public finance, and using the Delaware River Basin hydraulic fracturing debate as a case study, this dissertation examines how discourse coalitions evolve, how discourse brokers shape coalition dynamics, and whether resulting policy decisions produce meaningful fiscal consequences. The first paper investigates how discourse coalitions shifted across three periods of the Delaware River Basin fracking debate, using a mix of methods integrating discourse network analysis, computational text analysis, and qualitative analysis. The second paper develops the concept of the discourse broker, showing that brokerage is both a structural network position and a strategic behavioral role based on language. The third essay examines the fiscal consequences of the fracking moratorium and Pennsylvania's Act 13 impact fee collected from fracking, finding that while drilling activity generates additional revenues, these revenues do not translate into broader fiscal health.

License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Share

COinS