Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-20-2011
DOI
10.1080/10508406.2011.528317
Abstract
This study explores Knowledge Building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school and makes a case for a principle- versus procedure-based approach to educational innovation, supported by new knowledge media. Thirty-nine Knowledge Building initiatives, each focused on a curriculum theme and facilitated by nine teachers over eight years, were analyzed using measures of student discourse in a Knowledge Building environment--Knowledge Forum. Results were analyzed from the perspective of student, teacher, and principal engagement to identify conditions for Knowledge Building as a school-wide innovation. Analyses of student discourse showed interactive and complementary contributions to a community knowledge space, conceptual content of growing scope and depth, and collective responsibility for knowledge advancement. Analyses of teacher and principal engagement showed supportive conditions such as shared vision; trust in student competencies to the point of enabling transfer of agency for knowledge advancement to students; ever-deepening understanding of Knowledge Building principles; knowledge emergent through collective responsibility; a coherent systems perspective; teacher professional Knowledge Building communities; and leadership supportive of innovation at all levels. More substantial advances for students were related to years of teachers’ experience in this progressive knowledge-advancing enterprise.
Recommended Citation
Zhang, Jianwei; Hong, Huang-Yao; Scardamalia, Marlene; Morley, Elizabeth A.; and Teo, Chew, "Sustaining Knowledge Building as a Principle-Based Innovation at an Elementary School" (2011). Educational Theory and Practice Faculty Scholarship. 8.
https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/etap_fac_scholar/8
Terms of Use
This work is made available under the Scholars Archive Terms of Use.
Comments
This is the Author's Original Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the Learning Sciences on April 20, 2011, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/10508406.2011.528317.