Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-20-2011
DOI
10.1080/10508406.2011.528317
Abstract
This study explores Knowledge Building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school and makes a case for a principle- versus procedure-based approach to educational innovation, supported by new knowledge media. Thirty-nine Knowledge Building initiatives, each focused on a curriculum theme and facilitated by nine teachers over eight years, were analyzed using measures of student discourse in a Knowledge Building environment--Knowledge Forum. Results were analyzed from the perspective of student, teacher, and principal engagement to identify conditions for Knowledge Building as a school-wide innovation. Analyses of student discourse showed interactive and complementary contributions to a community knowledge space, conceptual content of growing scope and depth, and collective responsibility for knowledge advancement. Analyses of teacher and principal engagement showed supportive conditions such as shared vision; trust in student competencies to the point of enabling transfer of agency for knowledge advancement to students; ever-deepening understanding of Knowledge Building principles; knowledge emergent through collective responsibility; a coherent systems perspective; teacher professional Knowledge Building communities; and leadership supportive of innovation at all levels. More substantial advances for students were related to years of teachers’ experience in this progressive knowledge-advancing enterprise.
Recommended Citation
Zhang, Jianwei; Hong, Huang-Yao; Scardamalia, Marlene; Morley, Elizabeth A.; and Teo, Chew, "Sustaining Knowledge Building as a Principle-Based Innovation at an Elementary School" (2011). Educational Theory and Practice Faculty Scholarship. 8.
https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/etap_fac_scholar/8

- Citations
- Citation Indexes: 170
- Policy Citations: 1
- Usage
- Downloads: 2786
- Abstract Views: 28
- Captures
- Readers: 210
Included in
Terms of Use
This work is made available under the Scholars Archive Terms of Use.
Comments
This is the Author's Original Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the Learning Sciences on April 20, 2011, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/10508406.2011.528317.