Author ORCID Identifier
P.D. Magnus: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2446-3494
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2023
DOI
10.1080/0020174X.2023.2213740
Abstract
It has been over two decades since Miranda Fricker labeled epistemic injustice, in which an agent is wronged in their capacity as a knower. The philosophical literature has proliferated with variants and related concepts. By considering cases in popular music, we argue that it is worth distinguishing a parallel phenomenon of art-interpretive injustice, in which an agent is wronged in their creative capacity as a possible artist. In section 1, we consider the prosecutorial use of rap lyrics in court as a central case of this injustice. In section 2, we distinguish art-interpretive injustice from other categories already discussed in recent literature. In section 3, we discuss the relationship between genre discourse and identity prejudice. The case for recognizing the category of art-interpretive injustice is that it allows one to recognize a class of harms as being importantly related in ways that one would otherwise overlook.
Recommended Citation
Evan Malone and P.D. Magnus, "Popular music and art-interpretive injustice", Inquiry, DOI 10.1080/0020174X.2023.2213740
Terms of Use
This work is made available under the Scholars Archive Terms of Use.
Comments
This is the Author's Accepted Manuscript. The version of record can be found here: Evan Malone and P.D. Magnus, "Popular music and art-interpretive injustice", Inquiry, DOI 10.1080/0020174X.2023.2213740