Author ORCID Identifier

P.D. Magnus:

Document Type


Publication Date





Art pluralism is the view that there is no single, correct account of what art is. Instead, art is understood through a plurality of art concepts and with considerations that are different for particular arts. Although avowed pluralists have retained the word “art” in their discussions, it is natural to ask whether the considerations that motivate pluralism should lead us to abandon art talk altogether; that is, should pluralism lead to eliminativism? This paper addresses arguments both for and against this move. We ultimately argue that pluralism allows one to retain the word “art”, if one wants it, but only in a loose, conversational sense. The upshot of pluralism is that talk of art in general cannot be asked to do theoretical and philosophical work.


This is the publisher's pdf. The Version of Record can be found here: Magnus, P. D., and Christy Mag Uidhir. ‘Does Art Pluralism Lead to Eliminativism?’ Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics LXI/XVII, no. 1 (2024): pp. 73–80. DOI:

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



Rights Statement

In Copyright

Terms of Use

This work is made available under the Scholars Archive Terms of Use.