"The Interpretation Of Measurement" by Austin David O'Connor

Date of Award

8-1-2023

Language

English

Document Type

Master's Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Arts (MA)

College/School/Department

Department of Philosophy

Dissertation/Thesis Chair

P. D Magnus

Committee Members

Ron A McClamrock

Keywords

Engineering, Interpretation, Measurement, Metrology, Representation, Science

Subject Categories

Philosophy of Science

Abstract

The interpretation of measurement representations, such as blueprints and 3D models, has been debated in engineering offices and philosophical colloquiums alike. A resurgence has begun in the philosophical literature which focuses on the recent International System of Units (SI) change in the base unit definitions. Additionally, a recent revision in the form of ASME Y14.5-2018 has been adopted by prominent engineering firms in America. This revision limits the number of viable interpretations for the Geometric Dimensioning & Tolerancing (GD&T) system of blueprint guidelines, which is meant to more effectively streamline communication between differing industries regarding part features and allowable extremities. However, despite these discussions and advances, the variations in interpretation continue to plague the production of parts and the communication between industry departments.

Share

COinS